"In one of the craziest proclamations I've ever read, the Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee has banned judges from 'friending' lawyers on social-networking sites. The reason? It 'reasonably conveys to others the impression that these lawyer 'friends' are in a special position to influence the judge.'
Ashby Jones, of the The Wall Street Journal's Legal Blog, raises the obvious point: When he first signed up for Facebook, back in the fall of 2007, 'friending' someone was akin to confirming a pre-existing friendship--an act that would justify the Committee's opinion. But since then, he writes, 'it's taken on a different meaning. I've friended friends, friends of friends, acquaintances, work colleagues, people who claim to know me, people from my past I barely remember, and people who probably requested my 'friendship' completely by mistake or through some sort of elaborate spam ruse that I'm not smart enough to figure out.' In other words, modern-day 'friending' rarely connotes actual friendship, especially on more professional social networks, such as LinkedIn and Twitter. (Several Committee members shared this belief, but were overruled.)"
Steak or human flesh? Let's look at our nutritional value - CNET - This week's top YouTube videos test cannibalism, as well as debunk Flat Earthers and reveal seals for the jerks they are.
1 hour ago